[blml] Profit from irregularites

[Ed Reppert]

On Dec 11, 2006, at 10:57 AM, Alain Gottcheiner wrote:

> It isn't an agreement about a post-infraction situation, but it is a
> specific agreement nevertheless. Allowed or not ?

If it's not, then one must toss *all* pertinent agreements, and call  
on the basis of "general bridge knowledge" alone, uncolored by any  
consideration of agreements at all. I don't think *anyone* can  
consistently do that. Nor do I think that the laws should require it.