[blml] Profit from irregularites

[Sven Pran]

> On Behalf Of Tim West-Meads
.........
> L40A isn't relevant - in the sense that if we only ever apply Law40A it
> would be illegal to respond 2H to 1N showing spades if one had a
> partnership understanding that it showed spades.
> 
> If one reads Law40A with the bracketed clause removed "A player may make
> any call or play, without prior announcement, provided that such call or
> play is not based on a partnership understanding."  It is relatively
> easy to see that no permission is granted for any call based on a
> partnership understanding.

When the Devil reads the Bible .....

Sven