[blml] convention

Laszlo Hegedus hegelaci at cs.elte.hu
Fri Dec 15 21:07:06 CET 2006


Mike Amos wrote:

>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Sven Pran" <svenpran at online.no>
>
>  
>
>>>On Behalf Of John Probst
>>>4N P 5H.  4N is direct Ace ask, not Black
>>>
>>>Is 5H a conventional call? "...length or values...". The HA is values.
>>>      
>>>
>>Yes:
>>
>>Convention: 1. A call that, by partnership agreement, conveys a meaning
>>other than willingness to play in the denomination named (or in the last
>>denomination named), or high-card strength or length (three cards or more)
>>there. However, an agreement as to overall strength does not make a call a
>>convention.
>>
>>The 5H bid conveys a meaning other than willingness to play in Hearts.
>>
>>    
>>
>But Sven that doesnt make it a convention
>
>
>There are three clauses in the definition
>
>willingness to play in the denomination named (or in the last denomination 
>named)
>
>or high-card strength
>
>or length (three cards or more) there
>
>IMHO 5H shows high card strength and so is NOT a convention
>  
>
No, it does not show high card strength in general, it does not mean: "I 
have good heart-suit". It shows exactly the Ace of hearts, so YES, this 
is a convention.

>(at the very least this demonstrates what poor definition this is)
>  
>
Of course I agree with the last clause.

Laci

>Mike
>
>
>
>  
>
>>Sven
>>
>>    
>>




More information about the blml mailing list