[blml] convention
Wayne Burrows
wjburrows at gmail.com
Sat Dec 16 11:07:04 CET 2006
On 16/12/06, ton kooijman <tkooij at tiscali.nl> wrote:
> IMHO 5H shows high card strength and so is NOT a convention
>
> (at the very least this demonstrates what poor definition this is)
>
> Mike
>
> That sounds like a poor conclusion. If the fact that somebody draws a wrong
> conclusion from a statement (definition) makes the statement (definition)
> poor there is nothing but poverty in this world.
>
Agreed.
Explain how the conclusion that 5H is not conventional is poor. It
seems exactly in accord with the law to me.
Wayne
More information about the blml
mailing list