[blml] alertability
Ed Reppert
ereppert at rochester.rr.com
Thu Dec 21 17:07:57 CET 2006
On Dec 21, 2006, at 9:27 AM, Sven Pran wrote:
> Still this happens so regularly that it by necessity is treated as
> legal and
> OK, however with the risk of passing more unauthorized information to
> partner than would have been the case had correct procedure been
> followed.
So if "everybody" violates the law, we must in effect change the law?
Or in fact ignore it? It's a game; I suppose that's the pragmatic
solution, but I don't like it.
More information about the blml
mailing list