[blml] alertability

Ed Reppert ereppert at rochester.rr.com
Thu Dec 21 17:07:57 CET 2006


On Dec 21, 2006, at 9:27 AM, Sven Pran wrote:

> Still this happens so regularly that it by necessity is treated as  
> legal and
> OK, however with the risk of passing more unauthorized information to
> partner than would have been the case had correct procedure been  
> followed.


So if "everybody" violates the law, we must in effect change the law?  
Or in fact ignore it? It's a game; I suppose that's the pragmatic  
solution, but I don't like it.



More information about the blml mailing list