[blml] alertability

[Alain Gottcheiner]

At 11:07 21/12/2006 -0500, Ed Reppert wrote:

>So if "everybody" violates the law, we must in effect change the law?
>Or in fact ignore it? It's a game; I suppose that's the pragmatic
>solution, but I don't like it.

The will of the Men is expressed in the Law, and the Law protects them and 
punishes them (French Declaration of Rights).
Some could argue that, as long as UI from biased questions can be dealt 
with efficiently using the Laws, specific questions might be tolerated by 
the same Law.
I'd like to disallow specific questions, but only because I feel that UI 
canNOT be dealt with efficiently.

Ed's right in invoking pragmaticism ; if one had to give all details in all 
explanations of all bids, we'd rether limit session to a dozen of boards.

Best regards

    Alain