[blml] Revoke established?

[Grattan Endicott]

from Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
[also gesta at tiscali.co.uk]
************************************
"Say, from whence you owe
this strange intelligence?"
                     (Macbeth 1.sc3)
 -----------------------------------------------

+=+ I would say the statement in Law 57C is of interest.
                                    ~ Grattan ~   +=+
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Manuela Mandache" <mandache at free.fr>
To: "BLML" <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 9:36 AM
Subject: Re: [blml] Revoke established?


Selon Steve Wright <blml at wrightnet.demon.co.uk>:

>
> Where I play, it is the norm for singletons and cards of touching rank
> to be played automatically by dummy in tempo.
>

That means that, automatically, declarer implicitly accepts the play, so I
would
rule 'revoke established' whenever declarer doesn't prevent dummy from
playi...
er... placing the card in a played position.

Best,

Manuela



_______________________________________________
blml mailing list
blml at amsterdamned.org
http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml