[blml] Revoke established?

[John Probst]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Manuela Mandache" <mandache at free.fr>
To: "BLML" <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 8:36 AM
Subject: Re: [blml] Revoke established?


Selon Steve Wright <blml at wrightnet.demon.co.uk>:

>
> Where I play, it is the norm for singletons and cards of touching rank
> to be played automatically by dummy in tempo.
>

>That means that, automatically, declarer implicitly accepts the play, so I 
>would
>rule 'revoke established' whenever declarer doesn't prevent dummy from 
>playi...
>er... placing the card in a played position.

I don't have a problem with an illegal custom. the card is still "not 
played".

I have no problems with players tapping their final passes, but when 4th 
seat emerges with a double he has made the double in turn, and i insist the 
missing pass cards are now placed on the table.

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in 
your philosophy."

Hamlet, Act 1, Scene V  <-----  Arghhh a roman five!

best, John

>Best,

>Manuela



_______________________________________________
blml mailing list
blml at amsterdamned.org
http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml