[blml] Revoke established?

[Ed Reppert]

On Jul 4, 2006, at 2:41 PM, André Steffens wrote:

> We discussed a similar case on the dutch forum a few days ago. How  
> about
> stating that Law 46 B applies here:
> Incomplete or Erroneous Call
> In case of an incomplete or erroneous call by declarer of the card  
> to be
> played from dummy, the following restrictions apply (except when  
> declarer's
> different intention is incontrovertible):
>
> Declarer's intention to play the singleton is incontrovertible, so  
> Law 45D
> does not come into play


Jesus. Kaplan's "decide how you want to rule and then find a law that  
allows it" was bad enough. This "stretch the law all out of shape  
until it sorta fits how you want to rule" is.... words fail me. :-(