[blml] claim

[Ed Reppert]

On Jul 7, 2006, at 10:23 AM, Eric Landau wrote:

> Are those different enough mental errors to affect how we would  
> rule?  I don't see it.

If he miscounted, then when one opponent shows out, he has still  
miscounted and will probably still get it wrong. If he has assumed a  
distribution that doesn't exist, then when one opponent shows out he  
will, unless he is completely asleep, realize his assumption was  
incorrect. He will now realize that continuing the original line of  
play is irrational. Must we hold him to it regardless of that fact?