[blml] play from dummy [was Revoke established?]

Alain Gottcheiner agot at ulb.ac.be
Thu Jul 13 10:09:38 CEST 2006


At 11:18 12/07/2006 -0400, you wrote:

>The distinction is quite real.  Dummy holds, say, K103 in the suit led, 
>and declarer says "play".  If we apply L46B2, he must play the 3.  If we 
>apply L46B5, either defender may require him to play the K or the 10 instead.
>
>I think Ed is right that the current laws can be read to justify either 
>practice.  And also right to suggest that the L46B2 interpretation seems 
>more natural to the customers.

Especially in Belgium, where many players systematically use "plum" for 
"small plum" without it being considered by anyone as an incomplete designation.




More information about the blml mailing list