[blml] Encrypted signals (was: nearest card)

Grattan Endicott grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
Wed Jul 19 12:19:39 CEST 2006


from Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
[also gesta at tiscali.co.uk]
************************************
"Say, from whence you owe
this strange intelligence?"
                     (Macbeth 1.sc3)
 -----------------------------------------------
+=+ The point about Multi is interesting. The convention 
was devised at a time when the laws said simply 'meaning',
not 'full meaning'. It is in use now because SOs have used
L40D to permit something that had become an ingrained
practice before the law changed. In view of the precedent 
one should not argue if an SO allowed encrypted signals 
by 40D regulation.
                               ~ Grattan ~   +=+

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Konrad Ciborowski" <cibor at poczta.fm>
To: <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: [blml] Encrypted signals (was: nearest card)



Yes, he doesn't know that *immediately* but in exactly 
the same fashion he doesn't know immediately if somebody 
who opened the multi 2D has hearts or spades.






More information about the blml mailing list