[blml] Encrypted signals (was: nearest card)
Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
Wed Jul 19 12:19:39 CEST 2006
from Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
[also gesta at tiscali.co.uk]
************************************
"Say, from whence you owe
this strange intelligence?"
(Macbeth 1.sc3)
-----------------------------------------------
+=+ The point about Multi is interesting. The convention
was devised at a time when the laws said simply 'meaning',
not 'full meaning'. It is in use now because SOs have used
L40D to permit something that had become an ingrained
practice before the law changed. In view of the precedent
one should not argue if an SO allowed encrypted signals
by 40D regulation.
~ Grattan ~ +=+
----- Original Message -----
From: "Konrad Ciborowski" <cibor at poczta.fm>
To: <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: [blml] Encrypted signals (was: nearest card)
Yes, he doesn't know that *immediately* but in exactly
the same fashion he doesn't know immediately if somebody
who opened the multi 2D has hearts or spades.
More information about the blml
mailing list