[blml] Encrypted signals (was: nearest card)

[Adam Beneschan]

Nigel wrote:

> Konrad is right; but then he is always right :)
> Encrypted signals are *not* just pointless
> complexity. There are excellent Bridge reasons to
> encrypt signals and (apart from the specific ban)
> no good legal reason why not. IMO Forbidding
> encrypted signals is like banning the strong
> pass -- it prevents the game of Bridge from
> reaching its inherent potential.

Its inherent potential to do what?

                                -- Adam