[blml] Encrypted signals (was: nearest card)

[Adam Beneschan]

Ed wrote:
 
> On Jul 19, 2006, at 11:38 AM, Adam Beneschan wrote:
> 
> > But I cannot accept that "violating the spirit of Law
> > 40" is a legitimate reason.  It's actually quite ridiculous.
> 
> Those are your words, not mine.

Actually, Grattan's original words were "contrary to the intention of
Law 40B and 40C", which seems to me to be about the same thing.  Your
argument seemed to be supporting his.  However, I apologize for
anything I said that misrepresented, or could have been interpreted to
misrepresent, your position.

                                -- Adam