[blml] Your call
Karel
karel at esatclear.ie
Mon Jun 5 00:15:08 CEST 2006
Ok 2 parter - no peeking :>>
Teams
S QTx
H A98x
D AQx
C AQT
bidding proceeds
2S* 3H 4D ??
* 5+/4+ minors and (2-10 or <=4 losers)
Your call ...
see wayyy below for continuation
Ok now what actually happened
Teams
North
S Jxxxx
H KJxxxx
D K
C K
South
S QTx
H A98x
D AQx
C AQT
bidding
North South
2S* 2H(3H)** 4D 4H
all pass
* 5+/4+ minors and (2-10 or <=4 losers)
** Insufficient bid. Apparnetly thought the bid was 1S. Td called. Bid
not accepted. 3H was bid after enquiring what the 2S meant. Result 4H
making on a claim after D lead (H's are 3/0 and declarer didnt dump 4 spades
on the minors).
The opps call the td and say that 3H over a weak 2 bid generally shows a
decent hand. South KNEW from the ui that this particular 3H's was alot
weaker as North intended to bid 2H over 1S and not over 2S. They felt over
a "normal" 3H bid South had far too much not to pursue a slam and would
infact bid it after North showed 1 key card + the increased likelihood of
N's values being in the majors given the weak 2 minor opener. They felt the
score should be adjusted to 6H-1 as South had acted on the UI.
Extraneous info.
N/S play weak 2D/2H/2S ... (it was suggested that N may have missed the
opening bid all together)
Several pairs did bid the slam after a pass, 1H opening by North.
N/S played RKC
The committee allowed the result to stand. Comments ?
Karel
More information about the blml
mailing list