[blml] The term "cue"

[Ed Reppert]

On Jun 4, 2006, at 2:51 PM, Sven Pran wrote:

> I do not know the ACBL regulations but either they should accept  
> "yes" or
> "no" as an answer to an improper question where such answers appear
> adequate, or they should request that the answer to any question  
> related to
> the auction or part thereof, whether improper or not, to be a  
> _complete_
> explanation of the entire auction (so far)?   Do they?

No.

> A specific question related to a particular call is a violation of  
> Law 20F1
> and must be considered equivalent to an extraneous remark. Any  
> answer that
> directly addresses such a question should IMO be considered adequate.

Hm. So the procedure specified in the ACBL Alert Regulation (http:// 
www.acbl.org/play/alertprocedures.html) is illegal? What does the  
Norwegian Alert Regulation require?