[blml] Breaking the Law (was why ask ?)

[Alain Gottcheiner]

At 17:32 11/06/2006 -0700, Marvin wrote:

>The footnote says you call the Director when you have
>evidence of an irregularity, not a mere suspicion. Why is this
>footnote so widely ignored?

I must have missed something here.
Many TDs-thinkers (hoping this isn't an oxymoron ;-) have told and written 
that you have to "reserve your rights" as soon as possible, if only to 
avoid being suspected of trying to recover from an absurd result. Some (as 
in BW's Appeals Committee) say that in extreme cases (eg, slow BW), you 
might even call before the infraction, simply to establish "live" the break 
in tempo.

Are they all wrong ?

Regards,  Alain.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20060612/12587cfb/attachment.htm