[blml] The term "cue" [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
Alain Gottcheiner
agot at ulb.ac.be
Thu Jun 22 13:57:49 CEST 2006
At 11:21 22/06/2006 +0100, you wrote:
>I'd adjust on the basis of failure fully and freely to disclose. this is
>OBSCENE!
Yes, this is an extreme case, it is excessive, but I would welcome a
jurisprudency stating that, when a question is biased, answering the
question and nothing else, possibly withholding important information,
isn't an infraction. It is, presently, but changing that is a fine way to
deter people from biasing their questions.
A classical case : you open 2H and LHO asks : "weak ?" (which is absurd in
countries where weak 2's aren't alerted). If you play Dutch two's, partner
is allowed to answer "yes".
Best regards,
Alain
More information about the blml
mailing list