[blml] Clubbed Queen

[Sven Pran]

> On Behalf Of Ed Reppert
> On Oct 31, 2006, at 4:27 PM, Sven Pran wrote:
> 
> > At this place in your reasoning I must remind you that Declarer
> > called a
> > card that was not in Dummy. According to Law 46B4 this call is void.
> 
> So your position is that Law 46B4 takes precedence over law 45C4(b)?

Of course it does.

> What is the legal basis for this position?

L46B4 applies without any judgment in all cases where Declarer calls a card
that is not in Dummy.

L45C4(b) applies depending on judgment when Declarer makes a slip of the
tongue and calls an available card but immediately corrects this call to a
call for another card. 

Sven