[blml] Réf. : Re: Belgian TD exam questio n [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
Alain Gottcheiner
agot at ulb.ac.be
Fri Nov 10 13:14:54 CET 2006
At 14:48 9/11/2006 -0500, Ed Reppert wrote:
>On Nov 9, 2006, at 4:51 AM, Alain Gottcheiner wrote:
>
> > The Laws and their application use the principle that
> > - either you prove that the player cheats, and expel him ;
> > - or you start with the principle that he doesn't, and that every
> > error will be either inadvertent or a miscomprehension of the Laws.
> >
>
>Then what is the point of the "could have known" provision in several
>laws?
According to my teacher, it allows us to say to the offender :
"if you were a cheat, you'd have acted in the same way and that's the
penalty for it ; we assume you aren't but, since you did the same, the
penalty would be the same, except that no disciplinary action is needed ...
this time"
More information about the blml
mailing list