[blml] L20F1

Grattan Endicott grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
Tue Nov 21 16:05:42 CET 2006


from Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
[also gesta at tiscali.co.uk]
*****************************
"Reason's whole pleasure, all the 
                               joys of sense,
 Lie in three words, health, peace, 
                          and competence."
                       -~ Alexander Pope. 
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sven Pran" <svenpran at online.no>
To: "blml" <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: [blml] L20F1


> > >
> If South believes that his understanding is correct he 
> has given misinformation to opponents by not saying 
> anything. And unless the Director finds sufficient 
> evidence to a fact that South's understanding was 
> incorrect and that he was right in not saying anything 
> to correct North's explanation then he must rule 
> misinformation. (See also Grattan's comments).
> 
> If the TD rules misinformation he must consider that 
> East/West has falsely been given the information that 
> South has Diamond control and that West may have 
> been led away from a Diamond lead from this 
> information. (The fact that South indeed has such 
> control is in this situation irrelevant!)
> 
> Consequently an adjustment to 6S-1 is not far away.
> 
+=+ I would rule misinformation unless I found a clear 
statement on the CC (or in system notes) supporting
North's explanations. What a correctly informed West 
might then lead is another question; some of the time he 
might still lead a club*. A weighted adjustment could be
right (ruling out a trump lead, one light 66% of the time - 
two suits from three - or 75% of the time - nine cards 
from twelve - would occupy my thoughts).   
                                                      ~ G ~   +=+
*no suits would be mentioned in a correct explanation.







More information about the blml mailing list