[blml] L20F1
Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
Tue Nov 21 16:05:42 CET 2006
from Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
[also gesta at tiscali.co.uk]
*****************************
"Reason's whole pleasure, all the
joys of sense,
Lie in three words, health, peace,
and competence."
-~ Alexander Pope.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sven Pran" <svenpran at online.no>
To: "blml" <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 21, 2006 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: [blml] L20F1
> > >
> If South believes that his understanding is correct he
> has given misinformation to opponents by not saying
> anything. And unless the Director finds sufficient
> evidence to a fact that South's understanding was
> incorrect and that he was right in not saying anything
> to correct North's explanation then he must rule
> misinformation. (See also Grattan's comments).
>
> If the TD rules misinformation he must consider that
> East/West has falsely been given the information that
> South has Diamond control and that West may have
> been led away from a Diamond lead from this
> information. (The fact that South indeed has such
> control is in this situation irrelevant!)
>
> Consequently an adjustment to 6S-1 is not far away.
>
+=+ I would rule misinformation unless I found a clear
statement on the CC (or in system notes) supporting
North's explanations. What a correctly informed West
might then lead is another question; some of the time he
might still lead a club*. A weighted adjustment could be
right (ruling out a trump lead, one light 66% of the time -
two suits from three - or 75% of the time - nine cards
from twelve - would occupy my thoughts).
~ G ~ +=+
*no suits would be mentioned in a correct explanation.
More information about the blml
mailing list