[blml] Réf. : Re: L20F1

[Alain Gottcheiner]

-------Message original-------
 
De : Tim West-Meads
Date : 23/11/2006 17:10:38
A : blml at rtflb.org
Sujet : Re: [blml] L20F1
 
>As far as I am concerned it's better for opps to be
properly informed than for me to get a good score on the hand.  
 
Yet there are other pairs in the room, whose score will be affected by any
correction of mine (and opponents'). 
So, if it is at all possible to avoid arbitral socres, it'll be a good idea.
I claim (but YMMV) that allowing for continued MI in lieu of UI does this.
 
> If anybody (including me or pard) is fussed about the UI issue then pard
can leave the the table
while I explain or I can (as Alain suggested) write a note.
 
This works when parner says he doesn't know about the meaning of my bids ;
when he brazenly gives a wrong explanation, it won't work, because the mere
fact that I ask him to leave the table (of proceed to write an explanation)
is a hint that his explanation was wrong. Well, more than a mere hint.
 
So those two cases should be handled very differently.
 
Best regards
 
   Alain 
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20061123/fce76db1/attachment-0001.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1458 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20061123/fce76db1/attachment-0001.jpeg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 37976 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20061123/fce76db1/attachment-0001.gif