[blml] a matter of moment [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[John Probst]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sven Pran" <svenpran at online.no>
To: "blml" <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 1:32 PM
Subject: Re: [blml] a matter of moment [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]


We are taught in the EBU that we must not react unless summoned and that we 
must restore equity, no matter how we find out. Thus i restore the equity in 
a revoke case, but don't interfere with play. I got this wrong the first 
time it happened.  Thinking out loud, if I saw cheating I would still not 
react until the hand was over.  John.

> This implies that he for instance shall not in any way react on a revoke 
> of
> which he becomes aware in any other way than by being summoned to the 
> table,
> until after the provisions of Laws 64B4 and 64B5 have expired.
>
> I fully agree with such opinion which in my view is just another (and 
> maybe
> better) way of describing that the director has the role of a spectator 
> when
> he notices events in the room without being summoned.
>
> Regards Sven
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> blml mailing list
> blml at amsterdamned.org
> http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml