[blml] 25 something ?
Jean-Jacques Lafay
jjlbridge at free.fr
Tue Nov 28 23:25:06 CET 2006
Here is what happened yesterday (Teams, high level but played in clubs
with no director immediately available, although one can be reached by
phone if necessary).
2D - 2S -
3S - 4S -
4NT - 5C -
5D X - -
??
not that it matters very much, but here is the meaning :
2D was (french style) forcing to game, 2S showed a major Ace, 3S
natural, 4S a fit but nothing else interesting to mention, 4NT asked
about kings, 5C showed (as expected) none, 5D was a further enquiry,
probably related to the SQ, pass over the double of 5D denied anything
else of even remote value.
The trouble is that opener did not notice LHO's double and thought that
responder had a (very) blind spot and had passed 5D ! So he was under
the impression that the auction was over, and that he was playing 5D. He
therefore removed his bidding cards, which is of course normally viewed
as meaning "pass". As a matter of fact, he is (as the vast majority of
players) unaware of the various possibilities where a "call" can be
changed, he did not try to change anything when he realized he was
actually playing in 5D *doubled*, went 3 down for a loss of 14IMPs (6S
was on thanks to the 2-2 split, but was not bid at the other table).
I was wondering what the ruling should be if the player had tried to do
something when he realized what was going on : he did not really called
(he did not even know he had to call !), so if we judge that removing
the bidding card is a "pass", then it should be inadvertent, although
not a "slip of the hand", shouldn't it ?
Jean-Jacques.
--
More information about the blml
mailing list