[blml] Tie me kangaroo court, sport [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Alain Gottcheiner]

At 15:47 2/10/2006 +0100, gesta at tiscali.co.uk wrote:

> >
> >> However, when a player makes any gesture towards
> > >one's bidding box, the irregularity has already happened.
> >>>
>+=+ The statement is too sweeping. There is only an
>irregularity if the action is prohibited by regulation.
>Otherwise it is an extraneous action.
>         The possibilities are that an action may be
>1. 'lawful' - authorized by an express provision of law or
>     regulation
>2. 'infractive' - contrary to an express provision of law or
>     regulation
>3. 'extraneous' - neither of the above.
>The movement of the hand to the box would be an
>infraction if it were designed to communicate
>information purposefully to partner.

Indeed, but it would nevertheless, in all cases, be an irregularity, i.e. 
deviation from normal procedure (which sates that extraneous gestures shall 
be avoided). And I was speaking about avoiding partner's irregularity, not 
infraction.