[blml] Tie me kangaroo court, sport [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Robert Geller]

Thanks for the explanation of the history.
I hope the next version of the laws will clean up as many
of these ambiuities as possible.

richard.hills at immi.gov.au writes:
[snip]
>Of course, most Aussie TDs are unaware of the ABF National
>Authority ruling, since its minutes are merely published on the
>ABF website, but not in the widely-read free ABF Newsletter.
I found minutes of two meetings here:
http://www.abf.com.au/about/natauth.html
They're well hidden, even for being on the website.

[snip]

>The WBF Executive Council, at its Montreal meeting in 2002,
>gave a riding instruction to the WBF LC drafting sub-committee
>that ambiguity should be minimised in next year's Lawbook.
>
>Of course, given the length and complexity of the 1997 Lawbook,
>this is a Sisyphean task.  But to a certain extent blml is a
>friend of Sisyphus, as blml finds stones of ambiguity that
>might otherwise be overlooked until 2017.
It's a big job indeed.   Looking forward to seeing the new laws sometime
soon.

-Bob


-----------------------------------------------------
Robert (Bob) Geller,     Tokyo, Japan        geller at nifty.com