[blml] Authorized, Ethical ou Inethical?

[Alain Gottcheiner]

At 14:11 4/10/2006 +0200, you wrote:

>
>A player holds two touching cards (as king-queen),
>he can play anyone of those or another one,
>Q: When he "thinks" a while before playing and want to play a "high" card, 
>must he play
>a) the biggest one (king)
>b) the smallest one (the queen)
>c) anyone of those two cards,
>and if you says he must use a) or b), please explain accordin to something 
>like a Law, a Rule, a Way of doing accordin to ..., a Writing of ...

The answer, in my philosophy, is "any card that wouldn't decieve 
opponents". Playing a card that one knows could decieve (in association 
with the tempo) is an impropriety (L72 ?). Usually, this would mean b) 
(especially when playing 4th to the trick) but there is no Law about it. 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20061004/668c2264/attachment.htm