[blml] Fw: Positronic brain

raija mustikka at charter.net
Tue Oct 10 17:57:30 CEST 2006


Sent to HDW only, in error.  I meant it for the group.
Raija D.


>>
>> What I am trying to point out is that there was UI, and that there is
>> then AI. And that the combination of both means that there are no
>> longer L16 restrictions (in the sense of knowing it is strong, not
>> weak - the L16 restrictions about it being not easy remain).
>>
>>> Regards Sven
>
>
> The UI, IMHO, is that Herman's partner has been informed that Herman had a 
> hand that was not a clear 2C (the strong version).  In order to avoid 
> taking advantage of *this* UI, Herman's partner is legally restricted from 
> taking conservative views later in the bidding [he is not allowed to know 
> that opener may have borderline 2C opener]
>
> All in all, I find it bad taste and disrespectful to try to create a law 
> case for test purposes or for discussion purposes at the table.  The 
> opponents and partner are not there to be the case builder's unpaid 
> actors. As you can see, I feel very strongly on this point.
>
> Raija D.



More information about the blml mailing list