[blml] Fwd: Re: agreements

[Alain Gottcheiner]

>Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 17:15:43 +0200
>To: Robert Geller <geller at nifty.com>
>From: Alain Gottcheiner <agot at ulb.ac.be>
>Subject: Re: [blml] agreements
>Cc: blml at rtflb.org
>
>At 00:00 12/10/2006 +0900, Robert Geller wrote:
>>I don't think this is a laws question.  Rather the answer depends on
>>the alerting regulations set up by the particular sponsoring organization.
>
>Not really. The problem is not in the alert (a cue-bid is ofrten 
>considered self-alerting), but rather in the explanation. So I'll rephrase 
>it : "when explaining a bid -yours or his-, are you allowed -perhaps 
>compelled- to assume "standard" is the agreement" ?