[blml] agreements

[Robin Barker]

-----Original Message-----
From: blml-bounces at amsterdamned.org
[mailto:blml-bounces at amsterdamned.org]On Behalf Of Alain Gottcheiner
Sent: 11 October 2006 15:58
To: blml at rtflb.org
Subject: [blml] agreements

> are standard conventions considered "on" as a default ? _______________________________________________

I think this is a question for a partnership not for regulation.

If West assumes that standard conventions are "on" and East
assumes everything is natural unless explicitly agreed, then
they have no agreement.  If they have had a discussion
"of course we play all the standard Belgian expert stuff"
then they have an agreement (one which East did not
understand or has forgotten).

Robin

-------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and/or
privileged material; it is for the intended addressee(s) only.
If you are not a named addressee, you must not use, retain or
disclose such information.

NPL Management Ltd cannot guarantee that the e-mail or any
attachments are free from viruses.

NPL Management Ltd. Registered in England and Wales. No: 2937881
Registered Office: Serco House, 16 Bartley Wood Business Park,
                   Hook, Hampshire, United Kingdom  RG27 9UY
-------------------------------------------------------------------