[blml] agreements [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
richard.hills at immi.gov.au
richard.hills at immi.gov.au
Wed Oct 25 04:48:54 CEST 2006
Alain Gottcheiner:
>1. "I don't understand that agreement" doesn't necessarily mean "we've
>no agreement". Something TDs and ACs keep forgetting.
[snip]
Richard Hills:
I disagree. In my opinion, an agreement is a _mutual_ understanding of
_both_ partners, not a _unilateral_ assumption by _one_ partner. If one
member of the partnership never understood the Kalamazoo Club system,
then the partnership does not have an agreement to use the Kalamazoo Club
system.
Alain Gottcheiner:
>3. If a pair says "for everything undiscussed, we follow the Kalamazoo
>Club system", and the players have different ideas of said system, do
>they have an agreement ?
Richard Hills:
In my opinion, no. If one partner thinks that they are playing the
Kalamazee Club system, but the other partner thinks they are playing the
Kalamazaa Club system, then at best the partnership has a partial
agreement that they play the common-to-both-systems Kalamaz Club methods.
Alain Gottcheiner:
>In particular, may a book on that system be used by the TD/AC to
>determine the agreements ?
Richard Hills:
Of course, it is possible that a member of a partnership may understand
the Kalamazoo Club system, but _temporarily and infrequently forget_
their understanding.
So _if both_ players read that book and _if both_ players initially
understood that book, and _if both_ players mutually agreed to play by
the book, but then one of those players _temporarily and infrequently_
forgot what that player had initially understood, _only then_ the book
may be used to determine agreements. Therefore, in effect, the book has
become the partnership's system notes.
But if a player frequently forgets the Kalamazoo Club system, instead
frequently bidding according to the Idiosyncratic Individual system,
then those frequent forgets create an implicit partnership agreement.
Law 75B:
"habitual violations within a partnership may create implicit agreements,
which must be disclosed"
Best wishes
Richard James Hills, amicus curiae
National Training Branch
02 6225 6285
More information about the blml
mailing list