[blml] Two-way guess [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Alain Gottcheiner]

At 08:26 25/10/2006 +1000, richard.hills at immi.gov.au wrote:

>Should the directors have split the score on the basis
>that South's force to game was wild or gambling, and
>by bidding 3NT then later trying for a penalty South
>was attempting to perpetrate a double shot?

Not at all. This could only be the case when South expects a probable 
infraction (e.g. after tempo). Here, there is nothing to suggest this. So 
how could South imagine a double shot plan could be used ? (this doesn't 
remove the fact that South's call is bad, but that's another story)

NB : unless it's the first time responder held a (4333) type (and I doubt 
it), L75's proviso about repeated deviations does apply.

Best regards.

   Alain.