[blml] Chicago Casebook Posted
Eric Landau
ehaa at starpower.net
Thu Oct 26 16:00:47 CEST 2006
At 04:44 PM 10/25/06, Todd wrote:
>Marvin French wrote:
> > A course in statistics isn't needed to understand that small sample
> > sizes have very little significance. Player polls should never have
> > been instituted and should be abolished.
>
>ACs, frequently being small in size, constitute a small
>sample of opinion. And sometimes opinion of a too strong
>caliber. If we can't trust a poll of players for their
>judgement, why should we trust the AC? What process do you
>suggest replace player polls?
I don't think it really has anything to do with "trust". Rather, the
justification for polling players is exactly what Marv says: "small
sample sizes have very little significance". A course in statistics
isn't needed to understand that a sample of the AC members' plus the
consulted players' opinions will be larger, hence more statistically
significant, than a sample of the AC members' opinions alone.
Eric Landau ehaa at starpower.net
1107 Dale Drive (301) 608-0347
Silver Spring MD 20910-1607
More information about the blml
mailing list