[blml] The Rubaiyat of Law 58B2

[Ed Reppert]

On Sep 10, 2006, at 10:47 AM, John Probst wrote:

> Max IIRC has come down in favour of Major pen card, but has grave  
> doubts.
> He can stand minor pen card. The fundamental is whether the TD  
> tries to
> establish intent - and perhaps he shouldn't.

Given that Law 58B says nothing about intent, I would call "perhaps"  
an underbid. Of course, you still may have a problem if the offender  
blurts out his intent. Thus, it seems to me intent is irrelevant, and  
should be ignored even if stated or if somebody or other thinks it's  
obvious.