[blml] EBL 2004 appeal number 10

[Laszlo Hegedus]

Alain Gottcheiner wrote:

>At 13:03 20/09/2006 -0400, you wrote:
>
>
>
> >A, There's nothing more to say about my hand, no additional strength or
> >special distribution which i could show using our system
> >
> >B, I'd like to play the last bidden contract
>  
>
>>>P1, They should alert none of the two situations. Opponents know there
>>>are two possibilities, so if important they can enquier for that.
>>>
>>>P2, A is the usual method, so alert if B.
>>>
>>>P3, B is the logical method so alert if A.
>>>
>>>P4, The most of the players (including experts) have no agreement to
>>>this situation, so the pass can be the both type of hand. If EW has an
>>>agreement --- does not matter A or B --- they should alert.
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>
>I think P3 is intenable, as is every prescript of alerting "type A" passes, 
>as every player, in every system, has "difficult hands" that can't be bid 
>in such-and-such situation. Therefore, 90% of passes are "type A complete", 
>i.e. "I have nothing to tell, or I have something to tell that my system 
>doesn't allow".
>
>  
>
Sure I agree, P3 is strange ruling ind the real life. But which of the 
other three?

regards
Laci

____________________________________________________________________
Nagyobb szabadságra vágysz? Törj ki a négy fal közül!
Start ADSL elõfizetésedhez az EuroWeb mostantól havi 100 perc ingyenes WiFi hozzáférést biztosít számodra.
Részletek: www.freestart.hu