[blml] Live exam question

[Peter Eidt]

Hi Sven,

From: "Sven Pran" 
> My answers: 
> 
> 1: Yes 
> 
> 2: The Director should do nothing at this stage except explaining to
> the players all alternatives and consequences: 
> 
> If South confirms a revoke and corrects it he will avoid his revoke
> to become established. In that case West (if he wants) may without
> penalty retract his played (revoking) card and replace it with any
> other (legal) card. If West's original play also was a revoke this
> allows him to correct this revoke without any penalty. 

hmm, which law ?

> 
> If South did not revoke (very unlikely!) or does not confirm it then
> West is stuck with his play and an established revoke.  
> 
> 3: No 
> 
> 4: If West was not given the opportunity to correct his revoke
> without penalty it is established and must be dealt with as such
> after the play of the board is completed. 
> 
> If South did not revoke (very unlikely!) then the procedure is
> straight forward. 
> 
> If both South and West revoked to the same trick the normal revoke
> procedures are suspended and the Director must award an adjusted
> score on the board according to the most likely result had there been
> no revoke at all to this trick. 

But we are in the middle of a trick not at the end of hand ... (?)

Regards Peter

BTW: we were not in disagreement in another thread ;-)