[blml] Live exam question [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Guthrie]

[WILLIAM SCHODER]
> Quoting existent Law makes me feel that it may be the first 
 > time the writer has read it. I can read as well (or better)
 > than he can, but perhaps my penchant to include the intent
> of the Law is what so much grates on the self-styled savants.
 > The minute of the WBFLC  (of 2001?)is enough for me to do
 > the right thing. I suggest he read it.

[nige1]
I can't speak for Richard, but Kojak has hit the nail on the
head to accurately address the main concern of club directors
and ordinary players. Our knowledge of the law is poor. We may
have to interpret a law that we've just read for the first
time. We aren't privy to obscure minutes. We must rely on the
words of the law rather than try to guess what the authors
intended to write :)

To be of practical use to most directors and players, the
laws should be more complete, simple, clear and objective.