[blml] Live exam question [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Robert Geller]

>The South Pacific Zone (Australia, New Zealand,
>New Caledonia, French Polynesia) has also adopted
>the Law 61B zonal option.
Didn't know that.  Thanks.

>No, Steve was talking about the explicit right, not
>subject to any zonal option, that "defenders may
>ask declarer"; in response to Herman De Wael's
>assertion that a defender may _not_ ask declarer
>whenever declarer and partner show out on the same
>trick.
Defender can always ask declarer, but in the event that 
declarer was really void and partner was the one who
revoked then I suppose this is UI in zones
that haven't opted out of 61B (suppose it would
be OK in S.Pacific or ACBL, where the defender 
could legally have asked his partner in the first place).

-Bob

-----------------------------------------------------
Robert (Bob) Geller,     Tokyo, Japan        geller at nifty.com