[blml] Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[Grattan Endicott]

from Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
[also gesta at tiscali.co.uk]
****************************
"The best words in the best order"
                          ~ S T Coleridge.
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jerry Fusselman" <jfusselman at gmail.com>
To: "Bridge Laws Mailing List" <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [blml] Nobody expects the Spanish 
                      Inquisition [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]


> >
> > +=+ What would be the reaction if a Law 40E1 regulation
> > were to allow a player to consult his own convention card
> > when answering an opponent's question? (It would call for
> > a literal interpretation of L40E2.)
> >                          ~ Grattan ~   +=+
> >
> 
> Would the information gained from the card be authorized to that player?
> 
> -Jerry Fusselman
> 
+=+ If an SO were to institute such a regulation I cannot imagine
that the info would be anything but AI to all. But an SO who put 
such a possibility into being would have to say.   I do not really 
see it happening, but at times I have to contemplate (and think 
through such eventualities).
                                            ~ Grattan ~   +=+