[blml] Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[John Probst]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <gesta at tiscali.co.uk>
To: "BLML" <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2007 1:11 AM
Subject: Re: [blml] Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]


>
> Grattan Endicott<gesta at tiscali.co.uk
> [also grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk]
> *****************************************
> ".... a simple game continually made difficult."
>                                      # David Fairclough.
> ===============================
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Nigel" <Guthrie at NTLworld.com>
> To: "BLML" <blml at rtflb.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 6:05 PM
> Subject: Re: [blml] Nobody expects the Spanish
>               Inquisition [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]
>
>
>> [Nige2]
>> My fault. Sorry. I didn't make myself clear:
>> I was (again) proposing a  *change* in the
>> laws.
>>
> +=+ Even so. But it seems unlikely that the
> use of CCs would cease to be a matter of
> regulation rather than of law direct.

Grattan, have you got lost in your use of multiple negatives in this 
sentence?


>                      ~ G ~   +=+
>
> _______________________________________________
> blml mailing list
> blml at amsterdamned.org
> http://www.amsterdamned.org/mailman/listinfo/blml