[blml] Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition
Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
Thu Apr 5 10:41:39 CEST 2007
from Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
[also gesta at tiscali.co.uk]
****************************
"The best words in the best order"
~ S T Coleridge.
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
----- Original Message -----
Subject: Re: [blml] Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition
> > Grattan Endicott wrote:
> >>+=+ What would be the reaction if a Law 40E1 regulation
> >>were to allow a player to consult his own convention card
> >>when answering an opponent's question? (It would call for
> >>a literal interpretation of L40E2.)
>
> And the following comment was returned:
>
> I'd have said it would call for a change in L40E2, but perhaps I'm
> underestimating the ingenuity of the WBFLC or some SOs.
>
+=+ If you will excuse my state of mind, so much immersed
in the minutiae of the laws, I contemplated the words of the
current Law 40E2 - in particular ".... at his own turn to call
or play...". Reading this literally it does not exclude for an SO
the possibility of a 40E1 regulation authorizing the player to
look, in given circumstances, at someone else's turn. (Without
such a regulation it is illegal because nowhere authorized.)
The footnote would need to be interpreted so that the action
did not represent an aid to his memory but rather an aid to
opponent's information. That would be a question, but who
would step in to oppose the SO's wishes if the regulation
put it in those terms?
Oh the devil with such devious ingenuity!
~ Grattan ~ +=+
More information about the blml
mailing list