[blml] Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[richard.hills at immi.gov.au]

Grattan Endicott:

[snip]

>The footnote would need to be interpreted so that the action
>did not represent an aid to his memory but rather an aid to
>opponent's information. That would be a question, but who
>would step in to oppose the SO's wishes if the regulation
>put it in those terms?
>     Oh the devil with such devious ingenuity!
>                                         ~ Grattan ~   +=+

Richard Hills:

If the ACBL Board of Directors wished to use the Law 40E2
footnote to permit bunnies to refer to their own convention
card, there is much simpler devilish devious ingenuity.

The ACBL BoD could simply define all systems used by the
opponents of the bunnies as "unusual methods" and define the
bunnies' convention cards as "written defences ... to be
referred to at the table".

:-)


Best wishes

Richard James Hills, amicus curiae
National Training Branch, DIAC
02 6223 9052

Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please advise
the sender and delete the message and attachments immediately.  This email,
including attachments, may contain confidential, sensitive, legally
privileged and/or copyright information.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. DIAC respects your privacy and
has obligations under the Privacy Act 1988. The official departmental
privacy policy can be viewed on the department's website at www.immi.gov.au
See: http://www.immi.gov.au/functional/privacy.htm