[blml] Ré&. : Re: Fwd: Re: MI and Logical Alternatives
Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
Fri Apr 6 15:32:15 CEST 2007
Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet .co.uk
[also gesta at tiscali.co.uk]
**********************
"And if I loved you Wednesday
What is that to you?
I do not love you Thursday,
So much is true."
- Edna St. V. Millay
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim West-Meads" <twm at cix.co.uk>
To: <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: Ré&. : Re: [blml] Fwd: Re: MI and Logical Alternatives
> Alain asked:
>
>> 3) Are we allowed to make a longitutinal hairsplitting weighted socre?
>
> I don't know. We would be if L12c3 were enabled.
>
>> 6D 30%
>> 6N 20 %
>> 6SX 20 %
>> 5D 20 %
>> 7S X 10 %
>
> Although I wouldn't consider 5D a possibility on any auction so I'd
> propose maybe 45/25/20/0/10. Under 12c2 I think I'd get OS:7Sx NOS:6D.
>
> Tim
>
+=+ Two points:
1. The adjustment is a matter of bridge judgement
and therefore beyond the limits of principle that
are the competency of the WBF Laws Committee.
2. Guidance for Directors and ACs may be given by
regulatory bodies. The EBU in its White Book
confines its examples to a maximum of four different
results (variously in Section 12). It is commonly
thought that beyond four the calculations become
over refined, esoteric, and should rarely be
indulged - but I have seen no specific limitation of
them in advice to TDs.
~ G ~ +=+
More information about the blml
mailing list