[blml] Ré&. : Re: Fwd: Re: MI and Logical Alternatives

Grattan Endicott grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk
Fri Apr 6 15:32:15 CEST 2007


Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet .co.uk
[also gesta at tiscali.co.uk]
**********************
"And if I loved you Wednesday
 What is that to you?
 I do not love you Thursday,
 So much is true."
                - Edna St. V. Millay
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tim West-Meads" <twm at cix.co.uk>
To: <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: Ré&. : Re: [blml] Fwd: Re: MI and Logical Alternatives


> Alain asked:
>
>> 3) Are we allowed to make a longitutinal hairsplitting weighted socre?
>
> I don't know.  We would be if L12c3 were enabled.
>
>> 6D      30%
>> 6N      20 %
>> 6SX   20 %
>> 5D     20 %
>> 7S X  10 %
>
> Although I wouldn't consider 5D a possibility on any auction so I'd
> propose maybe 45/25/20/0/10.  Under 12c2 I think I'd get OS:7Sx NOS:6D.
>
> Tim
>
+=+ Two points:
        1. The adjustment is a matter of bridge judgement
            and therefore beyond the limits of principle that
            are the competency of the WBF Laws Committee.
        2. Guidance for Directors and ACs may be given by
            regulatory bodies. The EBU in its White Book
           confines its examples to a maximum of four different
           results (variously in Section 12). It is commonly
           thought that beyond four the calculations become
           over refined, esoteric, and should rarely be
           indulged - but I have seen no specific limitation of
           them in advice to TDs.
                                            ~ G ~   +=+ 





More information about the blml mailing list