[blml] Réf. : Re: Fwd: Re: MI and Logical Alternatives

[Alain Gottcheiner]

-------Message original-------
 
De : Tim West-Meads
Date : 04/06/07 11:51:48
A : blml at rtflb.org
Sujet : Re: [blml] Fwd: Re: MI and Logical Alternatives
 
Alain wrote:
>
> AG : I'd rather say "pragmatics". But indeed, 4S looks like a a
> possible bid. Note that, after 3S too, 6S  could be the final
> contract.
 
Tim : I don't think it's at all likely though.  Over 3S West would surely
try
3N making 6N obvious over a 6S sacrifice.
 
AG : seems like any weighted score should consider many cases. For example,
the bidding might go :
 
1D        p        2D        3S
3NT    5S       6D        X
p         6S       6NT      p
p         7S
 
where X = no defensive trick.
 
1) Doesn't the mere fact that we discuss what could happen after a 3S ou 4S
bid indicate without doubt that those bids are indeed a possibility ? 
 
2) If (at pairs) EW didn't find 6NT here, why should they find it after
competition ?
 
3) Are we allowed to make a longitutinal hairsplitting weighted socre ?
 
6D      30%
6N      20 %
6SX   20 %
5D     20 %
7S X  10 %
 
Best regards
 
   Alain
 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070406/2d3aeefc/attachment-0001.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1458 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070406/2d3aeefc/attachment-0001.jpeg 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 16816 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.amsterdamned.org/pipermail/blml/attachments/20070406/2d3aeefc/attachment-0001.gif