[blml] Any redress or rub of the green [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[richard.hills at immi.gov.au]

Karel:

>...there can be no argument that the CC is
>the definitive agreement...

Law 75B:

"...habitual violations within a partnership
may create implicit agreements, which must
be disclosed..."

Richard Hills:

There can be no argument that Ghestem is a
very accident-prone convention, with many
players habitually violating it due to
frequent memory lapses.

So there can be no argument that the system
card / convention card is _not always_ a
definitively accurate statement of mutual
partnership understandings.


Best wishes

Richard James Hills, amicus curiae
National Training Branch, DIAC
02 6223 9052

Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please advise
the sender and delete the message and attachments immediately.  This email,
including attachments, may contain confidential, sensitive, legally
privileged and/or copyright information.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. DIAC respects your privacy and
has obligations under the Privacy Act 1988. The official departmental
privacy policy can be viewed on the department's website at www.immi.gov.au
See: http://www.immi.gov.au/functional/privacy.htm