[blml] ...have we really come to this??? [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

[richard.hills at immi.gov.au]

Tim West-Meads:

>>...until the WBFLC explicitly state otherwise I will continue to
>>rule on that basis.

Richard Hills:

You want "explicit" from the WBFLC ???

WBF Laws Committee minutes 27 August 2002, item 4(i):

>4. (i) The Committee spent some time considering a summary of WBF
>Laws Committee decisions 1997-2001, prepared at the Chairman's
>invitation by Mr. D W Stevenson. The Committee had a difficulty
>with certain of the statements and it was agreed that, whilst the
>purpose of the exercise is a desirable one, the discussion of this
>document should continue via the internet. Meanwhile any
>publication of the document is not approved. It was noted that the
>minutes of the Laws Committee remain the definitive source of
>information as to its decisions.

Richard Hills:

When discussing the above minute, a colourful bridge administrator
asserted:

"But the reason the WBFLC did not approve them is well known: some
of the Committee thought the actual minutes meant the exact
opposite to what other members of the Committee thought!"

:-)  :-)  :-)


Best wishes

Richard James Hills, amicus curiae
Level 6 Aqua Training Suite, DIAC
02 6225 6776

Important Notice: If you have received this email by mistake, please advise
the sender and delete the message and attachments immediately.  This email,
including attachments, may contain confidential, sensitive, legally
privileged and/or copyright information.  Any review, retransmission,
dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other
than the intended recipient is prohibited. DIAC respects your privacy and
has obligations under the Privacy Act 1988. The official departmental
privacy policy can be viewed on the department's website at www.immi.gov.au
See: http://www.immi.gov.au/functional/privacy.htm