[blml] played or not?
André Steffens
andre.steffens at hccnet.nl
Tue Aug 7 18:20:05 CEST 2007
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
The contract is 3NT but declarer is confused and he thinks he's playing 5
diamonds. He plays a card from hand and instructs dummy to "ruff". When the
table stops laughing, the director is called.
Has the lowest diamond been played or not?
--
Herman DE WAEL
-----------------------------
Law 46B:
In case of an incomplete or erroneous call by declarer of the card to be
played from dummy, the following restrictions apply (except when declarers
different intention is incontrovertible)
To me it seems that declarer's intention was incontrovertible to play a
small diamond.
André
More information about the blml
mailing list