[blml] played or not?

[Alain Gottcheiner]

At 18:20 7/08/2007 +0200, André Steffens wrote:

>Law 46B:
>In case of an incomplete or erroneous call by declarer of the card to be
>played from dummy, the following restrictions apply (except when declarer’s
>different intention is incontrovertible)
>
>To me it seems that declarer's intention was incontrovertible to play a
>small diamond.

And how do you assess that it was a diamond that he intended as trump ? If 
you ask him what he intended to be trumps, he would be too ashamed to answer.

(Herman's second example, where declarer points to a specific card, is of 
course different)