[blml] Réf. : played or not?

[Ben Schelen]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jerry Fusselman" <jfusselman at gmail.com>
To: "Bridge Laws Mailing List" <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 8:20 PM
Subject: Re: [blml] Réf. : played or not?


>> +=+ I suggest you have to go to Law 46B5.
>>        Declarer has indicated a 'play'.
>>        In what he said he did not indicate a rank or suit.
>>        That seems to be what 46B5 says. The parenthesis
>>        has no part in the substance of the law.
>>                                                            ~ Grattan ~
>> +=+
>
Does that mean that in case Law 46B5 applies, that either defender may
designate the play from dummy?
F.i. the lowest diamond?

Ben