[blml] Réf. : played or not?

[Grattan Endicott]

Grattan Endicott
grandeval at vejez.fsnet .co.uk
[also gesta at tiscali.co.uk]
****************************
"A man forever undone by
 the second p in problem,"
                        [Epitaph]
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Alain Gottcheiner" <agot at ulb.ac.be>
To: "Grattan Endicott" <grandeval at vejez.fsnet.co.uk>;
"Bridge Laws Mailing List" <blml at rtflb.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 1:08 PM
Subject: Re: [blml] Réf. : played or not?


> At 21:27 7/08/2007 +0100, Grattan Endicott wrote:
>
>>+=+ Parenthesis expands, qualifies or explains. The
>> basic law can be read omitting the parenthetical
inlay.  This is not new, it is Kaplanesque.+=+
>
> It is more general : it is grammatical.
>
+=+ Edgar was nothing if not grammatical - at
times to the point of obscurity for all but the
recondite apostles. +=+